Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shawn Towey (she/her)'s avatar

Irrelevant to what you wrote, but I have been in the Capitol police holding area...or at least, where it was in 1985. This was in the midst of a year of coordinated daily arrests for peaceful protests at the South African embassy (remember apartheid?). After umpteen days of arrests with immediate release, our groups (some seminary students and some lesbians from Philly) were held for several hours and made to post bail, which we were not prepared for. The reason given was that the day before there had been an anti-abortion event at the Supreme Court where protesters poured real blood on the steps (ie, vandalism). So yeah, same thing? I didn't have much faith in the Capitol Police' ability to discern the difference. As I recall, the holding area was a large green-carpeted room with little furniture, but FAR more comfortable than the holding cells used by the Independence Park Service in Philly (been there too). They fed us bologna sandwiches (white bread w/ mayo) which left some of us vegetarians quite hungry. Thank goddess for Chinese restaurants that stay open till midnight!

Expand full comment
Richard Weingarten's avatar

Fun idea but it wouldn't work in practice. To begin with, it would need an O.K. from the Speaker and/or a majority of the House. Otherwise, the Capital Police would be ordered by the Speaker to release any taken. Police actions to the contrary would be swiftly enjoined by a Federal Judge. In short, your plan in the end would only mean more work for lawyers.

I fear that the resistance must be on the streets. telephones, Internet and in the courts.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts