Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim Dineen's avatar

I think historically, government business was always pretty much relegated to private outlets prior to radio and TV. One needed to subscribe to a newspaper to know what was going on. With radio and television, we got the golden age of Edward R Murrow and Uncle Walter over the free but commercial airwaves.

And then we got cable and the 24 hour news cycle - thank you Ted Turner. ::insert sarcasm emoji here::

The biggest demise of MSM was corporate takeover of thousands of local news outlets. FCC relaxing rules on cross ownership allowed corporations to raid and close anything deemed "underperforming" - "local" media is no longer "local" - and eliminating the Fairness Doctrine gave them carte blanche to publish whatever lies they wanted - thank you, Rupert Murdoch.

I live in Oregon and read about Creutzfeldt-Jakob in The Oregonian on Saturday. One confirmed case and 2 presumptive. Hood River County is about 50 miles east of us. We have a paid subscription.

We also have paid subscriptions to The Guardian and the AP. I read Reuters and the BBC news each day and glance at CNN - most of which is behind paywalls, nowadays and I don't feel like giving them money.

We dropped 30 year subscriptions to the NY Times during the Biden Administration and an equally long WaPo subscription when Bezos started his editorial censorship. I don't miss either one. And BOTH of them have the financial means to "fight back". They CHOSE not to.

I also left Twitter when Elmo bought it. I had an account for years and had never posted and probably only opened it a handful of times. I didn't care for the platform then and I don't care for it now. It is irrelevant, to me.

Your column really did make it sound like we're all petulant children stomping our feet. People stop subscribing and/or paying for something when it no longer suits their needs. And the vast majority of corporate MSM definitely doesn't meet mine.

Expand full comment
Richard Weingarten's avatar

The vise keeps tightening and , coincidentally of course, helps to prop up a social media outlet owned by co-President Mushrat. Given that the latter lost a few bucks (100 billion here, a hundred billion there adds up to real money) at Tesla and was helping to downsize Twitter (now X), there may be myriad explanations for all this turmoil, none of which benefit the American consumer.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts